![]() The fantastical architectural background is unlike any other by El Greco and may have been conceived by an assistant. The heads of the figures reflect the work of different artists, probably including the artist’s son, Jorge Manuel, a leader of the workshop in its later years. The maps were republished by the University of Chicago Press in Census Data of the City of Chicago, 1920 (1931), Census Data of the City of Chicago, 1930 (1933), and Census Data for the City of Chicago, 1934 (1934), although the versions used in the construction of this Web site are earlier editions published as separate pieces and held at the University of Chicago Map Collection.Although this painting features the bold highlights, elongated figures, and vibrant colors characteristic of El Greco’s late career, the artist enlisted his workshop to execute some parts of the scene according to his original design. Burgess was definitely among those who administered the analysis of the data that underlay them. It is not clear who actually made the maps, although Ernest W. ![]() Funded by the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial, this entity particularly focused on supporting Chicago research. of Sociology") were produced under the aegis of the Social Science Research Committee or its immediate predecessor, the Local Community Research Committee. The Burgess zones of concentric development can be seen in many aspects of Chicago geography in the 20s and 30s.Īll of these maps (even those that say "Dept. Conversely, outer-city neighborhoods like South Shore and Rogers Park that now have their share of problems were among the wealthiest. Virtually all of the other neighborhoods around the Loop that have one by one been gentrified over the last fifty years-even Lincoln Park-were among the poorest places in the city in the 1920s and 1930s. The only close-to-downtown neighborhood that was truly wealthy was a tiny sliver of the Gold Coast. Chicago in the 1920s and 1930s was, like Chicago today, a city of great economic contrasts, but the geography was quite different. Owner-occupancy was associated largely with the single-family homes at the edge of the city (the condominium would come to Chicago in 1963). Neighborhoods where immigrants from particular European countries made up a large proportion (though rarely a majority) of the population were still common. Population density in inner-city areas was generally much higher than it is now. The maps show a city quite different from the Chicago we know today. Focusing on population density, ethnicity, housing, and living standards, they could be said to constitute the first thematic atlas of any U.S. ![]() These maps are not very elegant and, in a few cases, are rather hard to read, but they are of great historic importance. Burgess-was the spatial structure of the city, which they tended to call its "ecology." One of the products of this research was a group of thematic maps of Chicago, based on census-tract-level data compiled for the 1920, 1930, and 1934 United States censuses. The focus of these scholars varied, but a major concern for many-including Robert E. These scholars, whose work is sometimes associated with the label "Chicago School," or "Chicago School of Sociology," played a major role in establishing urban studies as an important academic enterprise. "During the 1920s and 1930s numerous scholars at the University of Chicago did research on Chicago itself.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |